Home / Companies / Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. / 31 Mar 2026
Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.: meeting of 31 Mar 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. meeting of 31 Mar 2026. Their records fall into 2 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 29.2% of reported votes for; 35 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
101 vote records from 44 filers. 32 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 6.5% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
51 vote records from 33 filers. 27 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | Against * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report |
| Fidelity | Against * | Against * |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | Against * |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | Against * |
| Equitable | Against * | Against * |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | Against * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | Against * |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | Against * |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Pacific Life funds | Against * | Against * |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. meeting?
44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 31 Mar 2026. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 31 Mar 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.