Home / Companies / Alumis Inc. / 30 Jul 2025
Alumis Inc.: meeting of 30 Jul 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
59 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Alumis Inc. meeting of 30 Jul 2025. Their records fall into 2 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 50.5% of reported votes for; 45 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
218 vote records from 59 filers. 11 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
109 vote records from 59 filers. 0 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | Split or no vote | For |
| Fidelity | Split or no vote | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Split or no vote | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | For |
| Invesco | Split or no vote | For |
| Equitable | Split or no vote | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Split or no vote | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Split or no vote | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| SEI | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Nationwide | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | For |
| Global X | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Alumis Inc. meeting?
59 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Jul 2025. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Alumis Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Alumis Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Alumis Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 30 Jul 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.