Tecnoglass Inc.: meeting of 19 Dec 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

158 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tecnoglass Inc. meeting of 19 Dec 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 88.9% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

131 vote records from 40 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

85.0% for0.0% against15.0% other0.0% against management40 filers

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

203 vote records from 153 filers. 76 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.

39.2% for52.9% against7.8% other53.9% against management153 filers52.7% for47.3% against0.0% other46.4% against management7,079,977 reported shares

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 122 filers; three years: 11 filers; for: 5 filers; 1-year: 2 filers; none: 2 filers; 1yr: 1 filer.

204 vote records from 152 filers. 122 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3.3% for0.0% against96.7% other87.8% against management152 filers2.1% for0.2% against97.7% other87.4% against management7,105,999 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Say-on-pay	3. Pay-vote frequency
Vanguard	For	For	Split or no vote *
BlackRock and iShares	For	Against *	Split or no vote *
Franklin Templeton	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Charles Schwab	For	Against *	Split or no vote *
John Hancock and Manulife	For	Against *	Split or no vote *
J.P. Morgan	For	For	Split or no vote *
Goldman Sachs	For	For	Split or no vote *
PGIM and Prudential	For	Against *	Split or no vote *
Jackson National funds	For	Against *	Split or no vote *
Northern Trust and FlexShares	No report	For	Split or no vote *
SEI	Split or no vote	Against *	Split or no vote *
T. Rowe Price	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Lincoln Financial	For	Against	Split or no vote *
First Trust	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Russell Investments	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Nationwide	For	Against *	Split or no vote *
Brighthouse Funds	For	Against	For
Capital Group and American Funds	No report	For	Split or no vote *
Global X	Split or no vote	Against *	Split or no vote *
Federated Hermes	For	For	Split or no vote *
AllianceBernstein	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Hartford Funds	For	For	Split or no vote *
MassMutual	No report	For	Split or no vote *
Neuberger Berman	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Natixis and Loomis Sayles	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *
Baird	No report	Against *	Split or no vote *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Tecnoglass Inc. meeting?

158 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 19 Dec 2025. On say-on-pay, 76 of 141 voted against management (53.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tecnoglass Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Tecnoglass Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tecnoglass Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 19 Dec 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.