Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Arcadium Lithium Plc / 25 Jul 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025559 filers reporting

Arcadium Lithium Plc: meeting of 25 Jul 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

559 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Arcadium Lithium Plc meeting of 25 Jul 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 99.0% of reported votes for; 11 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,960 vote records from 153 filers. 2 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.7% for0.7% against0.7% other1.3% against management153 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

834 vote records from 565 filers. 25 of the 545 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 20 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.9% for3.9% against4.2% other4.6% against management565 filers85.5% for14.4% against0.0% other14.5% against management588,640,864 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 486 filers; three years: 14 filers; for: 14 filers; take no action: 9 filers; 1-year: 4 filers; abstain: 4 filers.

878 vote records from 557 filers. 20 of the 537 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 20 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2.5% for0.2% against97.3% other3.7% against management557 filers6.1% for0.0% against93.9% other0.9% against management661,363,003 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

329 vote records from 153 filers. 1 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.3% for0.0% against0.7% other0.7% against management153 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management281,779,228 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustForForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no voteFor
NationwideForForSplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Brighthouse FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalForForSplit or no voteFor
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XForForSplit or no voteFor
TransamericaForForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesForForSplit or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Hartford FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
DWSForForSplit or no voteFor
AllspringNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
MassMutualForForSplit or no voteFor
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
VanEckForForSplit or no voteFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Neuberger BermanForForSplit or no voteFor
American BeaconForForSplit or no voteFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
BairdNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Arcadium Lithium Plc meeting?

559 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Jul 2024. On say-on-pay, 25 of 545 voted against management (4.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Arcadium Lithium Plc on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Arcadium Lithium Plc

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Arcadium Lithium Plc with a meeting date within three days of 25 Jul 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.