Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Ares Management Corporation / 6 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025837 filers reporting

Ares Management Corporation: meeting of 6 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

837 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ares Management Corporation meeting of 6 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 63.3% of reported votes for; 181 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

5,333 vote records from 237 filers. 87 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

62.9% for36.3% against0.8% other36.9% against management237 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,220 vote records from 829 filers. 540 of the 800 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.

29.8% for65.5% against4.7% other67.5% against management829 filers59.3% for40.7% against0.0% other40.5% against management218,296,954 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 681 filers; three years: 69 filers; for: 10 filers; 1-year: 10 filers; abstain: 5 filers; against: 5 filers.

1,199 vote records from 813 filers. 689 of the 779 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 34 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.2% for0.5% against98.3% other88.4% against management813 filers6.2% for0.1% against93.7% other92.9% against management216,983,273 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

487 vote records from 237 filers. 3 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.3% for0.8% against0.8% other1.3% against management237 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management87,326,909 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no vote *For
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
FidelityAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
DimensionalAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
State Street and SPDRForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
American CenturyAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
EquitableForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Charles SchwabAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no vote *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no vote *For
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no vote *For
WisdomTreeAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no vote *For
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
SEIForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstSplit or no voteFor
VoyaAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
First TrustAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
NationwideForForSplit or no vote *For
Victory CapitalAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Brighthouse FundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no vote *For
BNY MellonAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
PrincipalAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Capital Group and American FundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Global XForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
MFSForForSplit or no vote *For
TransamericaForForSplit or no vote *For
Federated HermesForForSplit or no vote *For
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Hartford FundsForForSplit or no vote *For
DWSNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
PIMCOAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
AllspringNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
MassMutualForForSplit or no vote *For
Harbor FundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
VirtusForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Janus HendersonForForSplit or no vote *For
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Lord AbbettAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
BairdNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
Artisan PartnersForAgainst *Split or no vote *For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Ares Management Corporation meeting?

837 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 540 of 800 voted against management (67.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ares Management Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Ares Management Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ares Management Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.