Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Blink Charging Co. / 16 Jul 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025245 filers reporting

Blink Charging Co.: meeting of 16 Jul 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

245 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Blink Charging Co. meeting of 16 Jul 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

6 nominees; 75.5% of reported votes for; 42 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

612 vote records from 57 filers. 2 of the 57 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

66.7% for0.0% against33.3% other3.5% against management57 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

304 vote records from 237 filers. 154 of the 227 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

30.0% for65.8% against4.2% other67.8% against management237 filers63.4% for36.6% against36.6% against management11,868,756 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 213 filers; three years: 7 filers; for: 4 filers; 1-year: 2 filers; none: 1 filer; two years: 1 filer.

309 vote records from 238 filers. 8 of the 227 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.7% for0.0% against98.3% other3.5% against management238 filers0.6% for0.4% against99.1% other0.8% against management12,035,821 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

102 vote records from 57 filers. 1 of the 57 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.2% for1.8% against1.8% against management57 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.1% against management4,604,033 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
DimensionalForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
EquitableAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Charles SchwabSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
J.P. MorganNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Goldman SachsNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEISplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialSplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
First TrustForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
NationwideForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
PrincipalNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteSplit or no voteNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
DWSForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Janus HendersonNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
BairdNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Blink Charging Co. meeting?

245 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Jul 2024. On say-on-pay, 154 of 227 voted against management (67.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Blink Charging Co. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Blink Charging Co.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Blink Charging Co. with a meeting date within three days of 16 Jul 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.