Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Blue Owl Capital Inc. / 9 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025582 filers reporting

Blue Owl Capital Inc.: meeting of 9 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

582 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Blue Owl Capital Inc. meeting of 9 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 38.3% of reported votes for; 144 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,058 vote records from 182 filers. 107 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

41.2% for58.8% against58.8% against management182 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

835 vote records from 574 filers. 381 of the 553 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.

29.3% for66.4% against4.4% other68.9% against management574 filers54.2% for45.4% against0.3% other45.7% against management643,391,585 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 469 filers; three years: 56 filers; for: 7 filers; abstain: 5 filers; two years: 3 filers; 1yr: 3 filers.

827 vote records from 565 filers. 479 of the 542 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.2% for0.0% against98.8% other88.4% against management565 filers0.1% for0.1% against99.8% other96.1% against management650,293,580 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

353 vote records from 182 filers. 2 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.9% for1.1% against1.1% against management182 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management310,014,777 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no vote *For
FidelityAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
DimensionalNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
State Street and SPDRForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
American CenturyAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
InvescoAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
EquitableForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Charles SchwabForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no vote *For
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
J.P. MorganForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Goldman SachsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
WisdomTreeAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
Jackson National fundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
SEIForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
ThriventAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
VoyaAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
First TrustAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
Victory CapitalAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no vote *For
BNY MellonAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
PrincipalNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
Capital Group and American FundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Pacific Life fundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
MFSAgainst *ForSplit or no vote *For
Federated HermesForForSplit or no vote *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
DWSNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
PIMCONo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
AllspringNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
MassMutualAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Harbor FundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
VirtusAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Janus HendersonNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *For *No report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
BairdNo reportAgainst *Split or no vote *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Blue Owl Capital Inc. meeting?

582 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 381 of 553 voted against management (68.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Blue Owl Capital Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Blue Owl Capital Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Blue Owl Capital Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 9 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.