Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Boise Cascade Company / 30 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026500 filers reporting

Boise Cascade Company: meeting of 30 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

500 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Boise Cascade Company meeting of 30 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 93.5% of reported votes for; 14 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,430 vote records from 161 filers. 2 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.3% for0.6% against3.1% other1.3% against management161 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

749 vote records from 496 filers. 22 of the 475 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.5% for4.4% against5.0% other4.6% against management496 filers98.6% for1.1% against0.3% other0.9% against management42,847,846 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 440 filers; three years: 14 filers; for: 6 filers; abstain: 3 filers; 1-year: 3 filers; not applicable: 2 filers.

757 vote records from 488 filers. 16 of the 467 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.2% for0.0% against98.8% other3.4% against management488 filers0.6% for0.0% against99.4% other10.4% against management44,355,252 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

343 vote records from 161 filers. 3 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.9% for1.2% against1.9% other1.9% against management161 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.1% against management19,214,260 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustForForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no voteFor
NationwideForForSplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalForForSplit or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XForForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
AllianceBernsteinForForSplit or no voteFor
Hartford FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
DWSForForSplit or no voteFor
PIMCOForForSplit or no voteFor
AllspringForForSplit or no voteFor
MassMutualForForSplit or no voteFor
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
American BeaconForForSplit or no voteFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
BairdNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Boise Cascade Company meeting?

500 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 22 of 475 voted against management (4.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Boise Cascade Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Boise Cascade Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Boise Cascade Company with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.