Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. / 18 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026264 filers reporting

Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.: meeting of 18 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

264 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. meeting of 18 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

14 nominees; 92.4% of reported votes for; 64 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,618 vote records from 93 filers. 0 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management93 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

405 vote records from 261 filers. 16 of the 247 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.5% for5.0% against6.5% other6.5% against management261 filers95.3% for0.8% against3.9% other4.7% against management6,624,510 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 219 filers; three years: 17 filers; for: 4 filers; abstain: 3 filers; 1-year: 3 filers; not applicable: 2 filers.

409 vote records from 261 filers. 222 of the 245 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.1% for0.0% against98.9% other90.6% against management261 filers0.3% for0.0% against99.7% other82.2% against management6,386,231 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

187 vote records from 93 filers. 0 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management93 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2,778,937 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no vote *For
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no vote *For
FidelityForForSplit or no vote *For
DimensionalForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no vote *For
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no vote *For
InvescoForForSplit or no vote *For
EquitableForForSplit or no vote *For
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no vote *For
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no vote *For
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no vote *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no vote *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no vote *For
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no vote *For
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no vote *For
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no vote *For
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no vote *For
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no vote *For
SEIForForSplit or no vote *For
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no vote *For
ThriventForForSplit or no vote *For
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no vote *For
VoyaForForSplit or no vote *For
First TrustForForSplit or no vote *For
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no vote *For
NationwideForForSplit or no vote *For
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no vote *For
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no vote *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
BNY MellonNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
PrincipalForForSplit or no vote *For
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Global XForForSplit or no vote *For
Federated HermesForForSplit or no vote *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
DWSForForSplit or no vote *For
AllspringNo reportSplit or no voteSplit or no voteNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
BairdNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. meeting?

264 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 16 of 247 voted against management (6.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.