Home / Companies / Cadence Design Systems, Inc. / 8 May 2025
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: meeting of 8 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,282 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cadence Design Systems, Inc. meeting of 8 May 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 95 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,906 vote records from 373 filers. 3 of the 371 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,160 vote records from 1,264 filers. 109 of the 1,224 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 40 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
992 vote records from 370 filers. 4 of the 368 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding political spending.
952 vote records from 362 filers. 157 of the 359 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
4 vote records from 4 filers. 2 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * |
| Cohen & Steers | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Cadence Design Systems, Inc. meeting?
1,282 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 109 of 1,224 voted against management (8.9%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cadence Design Systems, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cadence Design Systems, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.