Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Cardlytics, Inc. / 23 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024211 filers reporting

Cardlytics, Inc.: meeting of 23 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

211 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cardlytics, Inc. meeting of 23 May 2024. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 97.5% of reported votes for; 5 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

281 vote records from 76 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.8% for0.0% against9.2% other0.0% against management76 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

302 vote records from 208 filers. 148 of the 198 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

24.0% for69.7% against6.3% other74.7% against management208 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

139 vote records from 75 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.0% for1.3% against2.7% other1.4% against management75 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management6,019,609 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *For
FidelityForAgainst *For
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
InvescoForAgainst *For
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganNo reportAgainst *No report
Goldman SachsForAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForAbstain or withhold *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalForAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst *No report
PrincipalForAgainst *For
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst *For
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSSplit or no voteAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *No report
DWSForAgainst *For
Janus HendersonNo reportAgainst *No report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Cardlytics, Inc. meeting?

211 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 148 of 198 voted against management (74.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cardlytics, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Cardlytics, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cardlytics, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 23 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.