Vote Scores

Home / Companies / City Holding Company / 30 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025341 filers reporting

City Holding Company: meeting of 30 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

341 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the City Holding Company meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 87.9% of reported votes for; 37 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

805 vote records from 121 filers. 4 of the 121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.9% for3.3% against0.8% other3.3% against management121 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

520 vote records from 337 filers. 35 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.5% for10.1% against2.4% other10.6% against management337 filers95.4% for4.6% against0.0% other4.6% against management10,382,820 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

267 vote records from 120 filers. 1 of the 120 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.2% for0.8% against0.8% against management120 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management6,287,706 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *For
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
Federated HermesNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
PIMCONo reportForNo report
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Harbor FundsForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the City Holding Company meeting?

341 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 35 of 330 voted against management (10.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by City Holding Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for City Holding Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing City Holding Company with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.