Home / Companies / Core Scientific, Inc. / 30 Oct 2025
Core Scientific, Inc.: meeting of 30 Oct 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
398 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Core Scientific, Inc. meeting of 30 Oct 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
927 vote records from 384 filers. 190 of the 294 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 90 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
15 vote records from 13 filers. 7 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
355 vote records from 102 filers. 57 of the 83 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 19 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
33 vote records from 21 filers. 2 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Merger pay |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | Against * | No report |
| Equitable | Against * | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | Split or no vote | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against | No report |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | Against * |
| Voya | Against * | No report |
| First Trust | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report |
| Principal | Against * | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | Against * | No report |
| Global X | Split or no vote | No report |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Split or no vote | No report |
| DWS | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| MassMutual | Split or no vote | No report |
| VanEck | Split or no vote * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | Split or no vote | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Against | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Core Scientific, Inc. meeting?
398 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Oct 2025. On say-on-pay, 190 of 294 voted against management (64.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Core Scientific, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Core Scientific, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Core Scientific, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 30 Oct 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.