Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CoreCard Corporation / 29 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202586 filers reporting

CoreCard Corporation: meeting of 29 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

86 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CoreCard Corporation meeting of 29 May 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 28.6% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

70 vote records from 22 filers. 13 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

22.7% for59.1% against18.2% other59.1% against management22 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

116 vote records from 86 filers. 5 of the 83 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.7% for4.7% against4.7% other6.0% against management86 filers92.8% for3.0% against4.2% other7.2% against management2,019,029 reported shares
3

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

35 vote records from 22 filers. 12 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

45.5% for54.5% against54.5% against management22 filers88.6% for11.4% against11.4% against management965,871 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRNo reportFor
American CenturyAgainst *For
EquitableSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportAgainst *
Goldman SachsAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *For
Russell InvestmentsNo reportFor
Victory CapitalAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *For
BNY MellonNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CoreCard Corporation meeting?

86 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 5 of 83 voted against management (6.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CoreCard Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CoreCard Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CoreCard Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 29 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.