Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CorVel Corporation / 10 Aug 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024326 filers reporting

CorVel Corporation: meeting of 10 Aug 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

326 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CorVel Corporation meeting of 10 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

6 nominees; 69.6% of reported votes for; 105 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,500 vote records from 130 filers. 13 of the 130 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

83.1% for0.0% against16.9% other10.0% against management130 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

479 vote records from 318 filers. 36 of the 310 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.8% for11.0% against3.1% other11.6% against management318 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 282 filers; three years: 18 filers; 1-year: 3 filers; for: 3 filers; abstain: 2 filers; : 2 filers.

480 vote records from 318 filers. 289 of the 309 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.9% for0.0% against99.1% other93.5% against management318 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

249 vote records from 129 filers. 2 of the 129 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

98.4% for0.8% against0.8% other1.6% against management129 filers
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers66.7% for33.3% against0.0% against management6,393 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no vote *For
BlackRock and iSharesSplit or no voteForSplit or no vote *For
FidelityForForSplit or no vote *For
DimensionalForForSplit or no voteFor
State Street and SPDRAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no vote *For
American CenturyForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForAbstain or withhold *For
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
EquitableForForSplit or no vote *For
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no vote *For
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no vote *For
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no vote *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no vote *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertSplit or no voteForSplit or no vote *For
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no vote *For
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no vote *For
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no vote *For
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no vote *For
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no vote *For
SEIForForSplit or no vote *For
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no vote *For
ThriventForForSplit or no vote *For
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no vote *For
VoyaForForSplit or no vote *For
First TrustForForSplit or no vote *For
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no vote *For
NationwideForForSplit or no vote *For
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no vote *For
Brighthouse FundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no vote *For
Columbia ThreadneedleAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no vote *For
BNY MellonForForSplit or no vote *For
PrincipalForForSplit or no vote *For
Pacific Life fundsSplit or no voteForSplit or no vote *For
TransamericaForForSplit or no vote *For
Federated HermesForForSplit or no vote *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
DWSForForSplit or no vote *For
AllspringNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
MassMutualNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
VirtusForForSplit or no vote *For
Janus HendersonNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
Neuberger BermanForForSplit or no vote *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CorVel Corporation meeting?

326 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Aug 2023. On say-on-pay, 36 of 310 voted against management (11.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CorVel Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CorVel Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CorVel Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 10 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.