Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Critical Metals Corp. / 29 Dec 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202654 filers reporting

Critical Metals Corp.: meeting of 29 Dec 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

54 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Critical Metals Corp. meeting of 29 Dec 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 3.6% of reported votes for; 46 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

87 vote records from 53 filers. 45 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

5.7% for86.8% against7.5% other91.8% against management53 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other1 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

87 vote records from 53 filers. 0 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.5% for0.0% against7.5% other0.0% against management53 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management752,201 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor
VanguardAgainst *For
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *For
FidelityAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonAgainst *For
EquitableAgainst *For
Charles SchwabAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *For
Goldman SachsAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *For
SEIAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *For
VoyaAgainst *For
NationwideAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsAgainstFor
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *For
PrincipalAgainst *For
Pacific Life fundsAgainst *For
Global XAgainst *For
Federated HermesAgainst *For
DWSAgainst *For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Critical Metals Corp. meeting?

54 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Dec 2025. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Critical Metals Corp. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Critical Metals Corp.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Critical Metals Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 29 Dec 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.