Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Essential Utilities, Inc. / 10 Feb 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026854 filers reporting

Essential Utilities, Inc.: meeting of 10 Feb 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

854 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Essential Utilities, Inc. meeting of 10 Feb 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

12 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

75.0% for0.0% against25.0% other0.0% against management12 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management1,766,238 reported shares
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale

1,189 vote records from 837 filers. 96 of the 788 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 49 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.3% for11.1% against6.6% other12.2% against management837 filers88.0% for11.9% against0.1% other12.0% against management225,073,432 reported shares
3

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

353 vote records from 153 filers. 5 of the 150 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.4% for3.3% against1.3% other3.3% against management153 filers99.2% for0.8% against0.0% other0.8% against management80,746,808 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

459 vote records from 185 filers. 11 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.4% for5.4% against2.2% other6.0% against management185 filers94.0% for5.9% against0.1% other6.0% against management85,296,371 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other0.0% against management110,254 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family2. Merger pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalFor
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyAgainst *
Franklin TempletonFor
InvescoFor
EquitableFor
Charles SchwabFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *
ProShares and ProFundsFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertFor
J.P. MorganFor
Goldman SachsFor
WisdomTreeAgainst *
PGIM and PrudentialFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
SEIFor
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *
ThriventFor
Lincoln FinancialFor
VoyaAgainst *
First TrustFor
Russell InvestmentsFor
NationwideFor
Victory CapitalFor
Brighthouse FundsFor
Guggenheim and RydexFor
Columbia ThreadneedleFor
BNY MellonAgainst *
PrincipalFor
Pacific Life fundsFor
Global XFor
TransamericaFor
Federated HermesFor
AllianceBernsteinFor
DWSFor
PIMCOFor
AllspringFor
MassMutualFor
VirtusFor
VanEckFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsFor
Janus HendersonFor
Neuberger BermanFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesFor
BairdFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Essential Utilities, Inc. meeting?

854 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Feb 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 10 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Essential Utilities, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Essential Utilities, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Essential Utilities, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 Feb 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.