Home / Companies / Exact Sciences Corporation / 20 Feb 2026
Exact Sciences Corporation: meeting of 20 Feb 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
734 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Exact Sciences Corporation meeting of 20 Feb 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,028 vote records from 718 filers. 449 of the 667 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 51 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
14 vote records from 13 filers. 6 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
305 vote records from 157 filers. 0 of the 155 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
410 vote records from 185 filers. 9 of the 183 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Merger pay |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | Against * |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report |
| American Century | Against * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report |
| Equitable | Against * | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Against * | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | Against * | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | No report |
| SEI | Against * | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Against | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report |
| First Trust | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | Against * | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report |
| Principal | For | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | Against * | No report |
| Global X | Against * | No report |
| MFS | Against * | No report |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | For | No report |
| Virtus | For | No report |
| VanEck | Against * | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Against * | No report |
| Baird | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Exact Sciences Corporation meeting?
734 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 Feb 2026. On say-on-pay, 449 of 667 voted against management (67.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Exact Sciences Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Exact Sciences Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Exact Sciences Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 20 Feb 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.