Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Fabrinet / 12 Dec 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024515 filers reporting

Fabrinet: meeting of 12 Dec 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

515 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Fabrinet meeting of 12 Dec 2023. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 90.1% of reported votes for; 41 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

775 vote records from 191 filers. 10 of the 189 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

81.2% for0.0% against18.8% other5.3% against management191 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

795 vote records from 505 filers. 34 of the 481 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

88.7% for5.9% against5.3% other7.1% against management505 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 443 filers; for: 12 filers; three years: 10 filers; abstain: 6 filers; 1-year: 5 filers; : 2 filers.

788 vote records from 499 filers. 15 of the 474 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

2.2% for0.0% against97.8% other3.2% against management499 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

388 vote records from 189 filers. 8 of the 187 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

95.2% for3.2% against1.6% other4.3% against management189 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoSplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceSplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustForForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no voteFor
NationwideForForSplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalForForSplit or no voteFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
TransamericaSplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesForForSplit or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinSplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
Hartford FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
DWSForForSplit or no voteFor
PIMCOAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteAgainst *
AllspringForForSplit or no voteFor
MassMutualNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
VirtusForForSplit or no voteFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Janus HendersonForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForSplit or no voteFor
Artisan PartnersForForSplit or no voteFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Fabrinet meeting?

515 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 Dec 2023. On say-on-pay, 34 of 481 voted against management (7.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Fabrinet on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Fabrinet

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Fabrinet with a meeting date within three days of 12 Dec 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.