Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Fluence Energy, Inc. / 20 Mar 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024319 filers reporting

Fluence Energy, Inc.: meeting of 20 Mar 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

319 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Fluence Energy, Inc. meeting of 20 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 47.1% of reported votes for; 68 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,957 vote records from 101 filers. 46 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

50.5% for0.0% against49.5% other46.9% against management101 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

422 vote records from 315 filers. 15 of the 296 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 19 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

89.2% for4.4% against6.3% other5.1% against management315 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 270 filers; three years: 10 filers; for: 6 filers; : 3 filers; abstain: 3 filers; 1-year: 2 filers.

417 vote records from 310 filers. 12 of the 288 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

1.6% for0.0% against98.4% other4.2% against management310 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

164 vote records from 101 filers. 1 of the 99 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

97.0% for0.0% against3.0% other1.0% against management101 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no voteFor
NationwideAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XForForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Hartford FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
DWSAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
AllspringAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
VirtusAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
BairdNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Fluence Energy, Inc. meeting?

319 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 15 of 296 voted against management (5.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Fluence Energy, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Fluence Energy, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Fluence Energy, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 20 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.