Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Flushing Financial Corporation / 28 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025246 filers reporting

Flushing Financial Corporation: meeting of 28 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

246 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Flushing Financial Corporation meeting of 28 May 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 86.4% of reported votes for; 33 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

752 vote records from 98 filers. 4 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

80.6% for4.1% against15.3% other4.1% against management98 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

351 vote records from 243 filers. 33 of the 238 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.4% for13.6% against2.1% other13.9% against management243 filers93.5% for6.5% against6.5% against management23,697,602 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

188 vote records from 98 filers. 1 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.0% for1.0% against1.0% against management98 filers99.0% for1.0% against1.0% against management10,779,049 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalSplit or no voteForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertSplit or no voteAgainst *For
J.P. MorganNo reportForNo report
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsSplit or no voteForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *ForFor
VoyaSplit or no voteForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsNo reportForNo report
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleSplit or no voteAgainst *For
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
Federated HermesNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Flushing Financial Corporation meeting?

246 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 33 of 238 voted against management (13.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Flushing Financial Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Flushing Financial Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Flushing Financial Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 28 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.