Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Geospace Technologies Corporation / 6 Feb 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025127 filers reporting

Geospace Technologies Corporation: meeting of 6 Feb 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

127 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Geospace Technologies Corporation meeting of 6 Feb 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 83.0% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

214 vote records from 52 filers. 0 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

55.8% for0.0% against44.2% other0.0% against management52 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

196 vote records from 127 filers. 17 of the 126 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

86.6% for12.6% against0.8% other13.5% against management127 filers93.4% for6.6% against6.7% against management6,324,298 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

107 vote records from 52 filers. 1 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.1% for1.9% against1.9% against management52 filers98.0% for2.0% against2.0% against management2,397,423 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRSplit or no voteForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
InvescoNo reportForNo report
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteForFor
ProShares and ProFundsSplit or no voteForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertSplit or no voteAgainst *For
J.P. MorganNo reportForNo report
Goldman SachsForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportForNo report
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaSplit or no voteAgainst *For
First TrustNo reportForNo report
NationwideSplit or no voteForFor
Victory CapitalSplit or no voteForFor
Brighthouse FundsSplit or no voteForFor
Guggenheim and RydexSplit or no voteForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
PrincipalNo reportForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSSplit or no voteForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Geospace Technologies Corporation meeting?

127 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Feb 2025. On say-on-pay, 17 of 126 voted against management (13.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Geospace Technologies Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Geospace Technologies Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Geospace Technologies Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 6 Feb 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.