Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Huntsman Corporation / 2 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024527 filers reporting

Huntsman Corporation: meeting of 2 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

527 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Huntsman Corporation meeting of 2 May 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 97.9% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,424 vote records from 166 filers. 0 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

97.6% for0.0% against2.4% other0.0% against management166 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

754 vote records from 517 filers. 115 of the 499 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.

4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

73.1% for23.0% against3.9% other23.0% against management517 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

342 vote records from 165 filers. 2 of the 163 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

96.4% for1.2% against2.4% other1.2% against management165 filers99.7% for0.0% against0.2% other0.0% against management71,584,760 reported shares
4

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding transparency in political spending.

333 vote records from 161 filers. 87 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

49.7% for45.3% against5.0% other54.4% against management161 filers33.0% for66.3% against0.7% other33.4% against management71,260,619 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForFor *
DimensionalForAgainst *ForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *ForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *ForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst *ForNo report
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForAgainst *ForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForFor *
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *ForFor *
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForAgainst *ForNo report
TransamericaForAgainst *ForFor *
Federated HermesNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo reportNo report
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Huntsman Corporation meeting?

527 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 115 of 499 voted against management (23.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Huntsman Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Huntsman Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Huntsman Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.