Vote Scores

Home / Companies / IMAX Corporation / 11 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025335 filers reporting

IMAX Corporation: meeting of 11 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

335 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the IMAX Corporation meeting of 11 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 96.9% of reported votes for; 4 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,870 vote records from 112 filers. 0 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.1% for0.0% against0.9% other0.0% against management112 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

468 vote records from 332 filers. 30 of the 322 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.0% for8.7% against3.3% other9.3% against management332 filers96.1% for3.9% against0.0% other3.9% against management39,764,235 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

187 vote records from 112 filers. 2 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.3% for0.0% against2.7% other1.8% against management112 filers99.3% for0.0% against0.7% other0.7% against management17,187,809 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForAgainst *For
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustNo reportForNo report
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForAbstain or withhold *
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
DWSForForFor
AllspringNo reportForNo report
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report
Lord AbbettForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the IMAX Corporation meeting?

335 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 30 of 322 voted against management (9.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by IMAX Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for IMAX Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing IMAX Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 11 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.