Home / Companies / Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. / 17 Apr 2025
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.: meeting of 17 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
764 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. meeting of 17 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 65.8% of reported votes for; 198 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,631 vote records from 218 filers. 9 of the 216 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,121 vote records from 751 filers. 178 of the 725 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
464 vote records from 218 filers. 2 of the 216 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | For | For |
| MFS | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | No report | For | No report |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Virtus | For | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. meeting?
764 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 178 of 725 voted against management (24.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.