Home / Companies / Jack in the Box Inc. / 1 Mar 2024
Jack in the Box Inc.: meeting of 1 Mar 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
379 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Jack in the Box Inc. meeting of 1 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 95.5% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,331 vote records from 137 filers. 7 of the 137 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
554 vote records from 375 filers. 31 of the 363 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
258 vote records from 136 filers. 5 of the 136 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Greenhouse Gas ("GHG") Emissions Disclosures.
257 vote records from 135 filers. 92 of the 135 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For * |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | Against * | For | Against * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Jack in the Box Inc. meeting?
379 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 31 of 363 voted against management (8.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Jack in the Box Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Jack in the Box Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Jack in the Box Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 1 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.