Home / Companies / Jamf Holding Corp. / 30 May 2024
Jamf Holding Corp.: meeting of 30 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
259 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Jamf Holding Corp. meeting of 30 May 2024. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 51.3% of reported votes for; 53 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
641 vote records from 92 filers. 39 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
357 vote records from 256 filers. 27 of the 247 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
161 vote records from 92 filers. 2 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| First Trust | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Nationwide | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Jamf Holding Corp. meeting?
259 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 27 of 247 voted against management (10.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Jamf Holding Corp. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Jamf Holding Corp.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Jamf Holding Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 30 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.