Home / Companies / Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. / 12 May 2026
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.: meeting of 12 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
676 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. meeting of 12 May 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 93.0% of reported votes for; 40 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,995 vote records from 201 filers. 1 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,031 vote records from 671 filers. 14 of the 650 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
455 vote records from 201 filers. 2 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on a stockholder proposal regarding support for transparency in political spending.
393 vote records from 178 filers. 105 of the 178 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
55 vote records from 31 filers. 16 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. meeting?
676 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 14 of 650 voted against management (2.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 12 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.