Vote Scores

Home / Companies / LegalZoom.com, Inc. / 3 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025306 filers reporting

LegalZoom.com, Inc.: meeting of 3 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

306 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the LegalZoom.com, Inc. meeting of 3 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 81.9% of reported votes for; 42 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

378 vote records from 106 filers. 0 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

65.1% for0.0% against34.9% other0.0% against management106 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

427 vote records from 305 filers. 243 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

17.0% for80.0% against3.0% other81.8% against management305 filers50.0% for49.9% against0.2% other49.9% against management137,974,831 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

189 vote records from 106 filers. 2 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.2% for1.9% against0.9% other1.9% against management106 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management39,106,681 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForAgainst *For
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForAgainst *For
DimensionalSplit or no voteAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForAgainst *For
American CenturySplit or no voteAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *For
InvescoForAgainst *For
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertSplit or no voteAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForAgainst *For
WisdomTreeSplit or no voteAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstFor
VoyaForAgainst *For
First TrustSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst *No report
PrincipalNo reportAgainst *No report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
Federated HermesForAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinSplit or no voteAgainst *For
DWSSplit or no voteAgainst *For
PIMCONo reportAgainst *No report
AllspringSplit or no voteAgainst *For
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Harbor FundsForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the LegalZoom.com, Inc. meeting?

306 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 243 of 297 voted against management (81.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by LegalZoom.com, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for LegalZoom.com, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing LegalZoom.com, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 3 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.