Home / Companies / Levi Strauss & Co. / 23 Apr 2025
Levi Strauss & Co.: meeting of 23 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
316 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Levi Strauss & Co. meeting of 23 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 61.4% of reported votes for; 64 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
610 vote records from 90 filers. 8 of the 90 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
430 vote records from 314 filers. 31 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Frequency of the say-on-pay vote
1: 2 filers; one year: 262 filers; three years: 13 filers; for: 8 filers; 1-year: 2 filers; none: 2 filers.
424 vote records from 309 filers. 14 of the 291 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
154 vote records from 90 filers. 4 of the 90 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
S/H Proposal - Corporate Governance Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting...
151 vote records from 88 filers. 3 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Pay-vote frequency | 4. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | For | Split or no vote * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | For | Split or no vote * | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | For | Split or no vote * | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | Split or no vote | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | For | Split or no vote * | For | Against |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Principal | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | Split or no vote | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Virtus | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Levi Strauss & Co. meeting?
316 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 31 of 297 voted against management (10.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Levi Strauss & Co. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Levi Strauss & Co.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Levi Strauss & Co. with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.