Home / Companies / Lyft, Inc. / 13 Jun 2024
Lyft, Inc.: meeting of 13 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
522 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lyft, Inc. meeting of 13 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 85.4% of reported votes for; 47 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
779 vote records from 146 filers. 11 of the 144 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
692 vote records from 517 filers. 329 of the 493 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
259 vote records from 145 filers. 4 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | No report | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * |
| Allspring | No report | Against * | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | Against * | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lyft, Inc. meeting?
522 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 329 of 493 voted against management (66.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lyft, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lyft, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lyft, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 13 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.