Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Mitek Systems, Inc. / 4 Mar 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025259 filers reporting

Mitek Systems, Inc.: meeting of 4 Mar 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

259 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mitek Systems, Inc. meeting of 4 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 97.8% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,136 vote records from 80 filers. 1 of the 79 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.5% for0.0% against2.5% other1.3% against management80 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

355 vote records from 257 filers. 69 of the 242 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 15 filers reported this item without a management mark.

67.3% for26.1% against6.6% other28.5% against management257 filers58.5% for37.2% against4.3% other41.5% against management27,611,973 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

142 vote records from 80 filers. 0 of the 79 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.8% for0.0% against1.3% other0.0% against management80 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management11,860,507 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForAgainst *For
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceAbstain or withhold *ForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
PrincipalNo reportForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Mitek Systems, Inc. meeting?

259 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 69 of 242 voted against management (28.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mitek Systems, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Mitek Systems, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mitek Systems, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 4 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.