Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Norfolk Southern Corporation / 14 Nov 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,435 filers reporting

Norfolk Southern Corporation: meeting of 14 Nov 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,435 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Norfolk Southern Corporation meeting of 14 Nov 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

43 vote records from 36 filers. 2 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

77.8% for11.1% against11.1% other6.5% against management36 filers97.3% for0.8% against1.9% other0.1% against management316,123 reported shares
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale

2,031 vote records from 1,387 filers. 91 of the 1,296 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 91 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.6% for6.1% against7.4% other7.0% against management1,387 filers96.2% for3.7% against0.1% other3.8% against management177,450,719 reported shares
3

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

634 vote records from 264 filers. 1 of the 261 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.6% for0.0% against0.4% other0.4% against management264 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management56,054,199 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

830 vote records from 310 filers. 26 of the 305 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.6% for8.1% against1.3% other8.5% against management310 filers93.6% for6.4% against0.0% other6.4% against management58,870,805 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management28,493 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family2. Merger pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalFor
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyFor
Franklin TempletonFor
InvescoFor
EquitableFor
Charles SchwabFor
Nuveen and TIAAFor
ProShares and ProFundsFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertFor
J.P. MorganFor
Goldman SachsFor
WisdomTreeFor
PGIM and PrudentialFor
Jackson National fundsFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
SEIFor
T. Rowe PriceFor
ThriventFor
Lincoln FinancialFor
VoyaFor
First TrustFor
Russell InvestmentsFor
NationwideFor
Victory CapitalFor
Brighthouse FundsFor
Guggenheim and RydexFor
Columbia ThreadneedleFor
BNY MellonFor
PrincipalFor
Capital Group and American FundsFor
Pacific Life fundsFor
Global XFor
MFSFor
TransamericaFor
Federated HermesFor
AllianceBernsteinFor
Hartford FundsFor
DWSFor
PIMCOFor
AllspringFor
MassMutualFor
VirtusFor
VanEckFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsFor
Janus HendersonFor
Neuberger BermanFor
American BeaconFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesFor
Lord AbbettFor
Cohen & SteersFor
Dodge & CoxFor
BairdFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Norfolk Southern Corporation meeting?

1,435 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 Nov 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 31 voted against management (6.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Norfolk Southern Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Norfolk Southern Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Norfolk Southern Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 14 Nov 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.