Home / Companies / Physicians Realty Trust / 21 Feb 2024
Physicians Realty Trust: meeting of 21 Feb 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
459 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Physicians Realty Trust meeting of 21 Feb 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
651 vote records from 444 filers. 339 of the 428 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.
5 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
14 vote records from 10 filers. 7 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
269 vote records from 138 filers. 5 of the 138 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
364 vote records from 160 filers. 14 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Merger pay |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report |
| American Century | Against * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | Against * | No report |
| Equitable | Against * | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Against * | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | Against * | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | No report |
| SEI | Against * | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report |
| Thrivent | Against * | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report |
| First Trust | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | Against * | No report |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against * | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report |
| Principal | Against * | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report |
| Global X | Against * | No report |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | No report |
| Virtus | Against * | Against * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | Against * | No report |
| American Beacon | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Against * | No report |
| Baird | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Physicians Realty Trust meeting?
459 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 Feb 2024. On say-on-pay, 339 of 428 voted against management (79.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Physicians Realty Trust on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Physicians Realty Trust
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Physicians Realty Trust with a meeting date within three days of 21 Feb 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.