Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Pure Storage, Inc. / 10 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026884 filers reporting

Pure Storage, Inc.: meeting of 10 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

884 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Pure Storage, Inc. meeting of 10 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 72.2% of reported votes for; 158 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,700 vote records from 245 filers. 28 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.3% for0.0% against12.7% other11.5% against management245 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,352 vote records from 878 filers. 207 of the 843 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 35 filers reported this item without a management mark.

71.1% for24.0% against4.9% other24.6% against management878 filers90.6% for7.9% against1.5% other9.2% against management312,645,287 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

572 vote records from 245 filers. 1 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.8% for0.0% against1.2% other0.4% against management245 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management112,851,714 reported shares
4

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management37 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableAbstain or withhold *ForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAbstain or withhold *ForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withhold *Against *For
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForAgainst *For
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Global XForForFor
TransamericaAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Federated HermesAbstain or withhold *Against *For
AllianceBernsteinAbstain or withhold *ForFor
Hartford FundsForAgainst *For
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
VirtusForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo report
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *For
BairdNo reportForNo report
Artisan PartnersForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Pure Storage, Inc. meeting?

884 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 207 of 843 voted against management (24.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Pure Storage, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Pure Storage, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Pure Storage, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.