Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Radiant Logistics, Inc. / 15 Nov 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025210 filers reporting

Radiant Logistics, Inc.: meeting of 15 Nov 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

210 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Radiant Logistics, Inc. meeting of 15 Nov 2024. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 54.5% of reported votes for; 60 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

652 vote records from 92 filers. 42 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

51.1% for45.7% against3.3% other45.7% against management92 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

307 vote records from 209 filers. 15 of the 205 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.4% for6.2% against2.4% other7.3% against management209 filers95.4% for4.5% against0.1% other4.6% against management29,595,797 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

163 vote records from 92 filers. 2 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

97.8% for1.1% against1.1% other2.2% against management92 filers98.6% for1.3% against0.1% other1.4% against management15,299,115 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalAgainst *ForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyAgainst *Against *For
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableAgainst *ForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *ForFor
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *ForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *ForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *For
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsAgainst *ForFor
WisdomTreeAgainst *ForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *ForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *ForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *ForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaAgainst *ForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideAgainst *ForFor
Victory CapitalAgainst *ForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *ForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
PrincipalNo reportForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
Federated HermesNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *ForFor
DWSAgainst *ForFor
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report
Lord AbbettForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Radiant Logistics, Inc. meeting?

210 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 Nov 2024. On say-on-pay, 15 of 205 voted against management (7.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Radiant Logistics, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Radiant Logistics, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Radiant Logistics, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 15 Nov 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.