Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Regional Management Corp. / 15 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025213 filers reporting

Regional Management Corp.: meeting of 15 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

213 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Regional Management Corp. meeting of 15 May 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 99.6% of reported votes for; 4 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,602 vote records from 90 filers. 0 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.8% for0.0% against2.2% other0.0% against management90 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

321 vote records from 212 filers. 7 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.5% for2.8% against5.7% other3.5% against management212 filers98.6% for1.4% against0.0% other1.4% against management7,178,323 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

178 vote records from 90 filers. 1 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.7% for1.1% against2.2% other1.1% against management90 filers98.3% for1.7% against1.7% against management2,750,473 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganNo reportForNo report
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
PrincipalNo reportForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
AllspringForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Regional Management Corp. meeting?

213 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 7 of 201 voted against management (3.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Regional Management Corp. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Regional Management Corp.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Regional Management Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 15 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.