Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.: meeting of 7 Feb 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

388 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. meeting of 7 Feb 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

530 vote records from 378 filers. 198 of the 363 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 15 filers reported this item without a management mark.

43.4% for50.8% against5.8% other54.5% against management378 filers67.6% for32.0% against0.5% other32.0% against management114,449,536 reported shares

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

200 vote records from 103 filers. 0 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management103 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management54,052,101 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

263 vote records from 124 filers. 14 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

88.7% for10.5% against0.8% other11.3% against management124 filers91.1% for8.9% against0.0% other8.9% against management62,509,855 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Say-on-pay
Vanguard	For
BlackRock and iShares	For
Fidelity	Against *
Dimensional	Against *
State Street and SPDR	For
American Century	Against *
Franklin Templeton	Against *
Invesco	For
Equitable	For
Charles Schwab	For
Nuveen and TIAA	Against *
ProShares and ProFunds	Against *
John Hancock and Manulife	Against *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	Against *
J.P. Morgan	For
Goldman Sachs	For
WisdomTree	Against *
PGIM and Prudential	For
Jackson National funds	Against *
Northern Trust and FlexShares	Against *
SEI	For
T. Rowe Price	Against *
Thrivent	Against *
Lincoln Financial	For
Voya	Abstain or withhold *
First Trust	Against *
Russell Investments	For
Nationwide	Against *
Victory Capital	Against *
Brighthouse Funds	For
Guggenheim and Rydex	Against *
Columbia Threadneedle	Against *
BNY Mellon	Against *
Principal	Against *
Pacific Life funds	Against *
Global X	For
Federated Hermes	Against *
AllianceBernstein	Against *
DWS	Against *
Allspring	Against *
MassMutual	For
Macquarie and Delaware Funds	Against *
Neuberger Berman	For
Natixis and Loomis Sayles	For
Baird	For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. meeting?

388 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 Feb 2025. On say-on-pay, 198 of 363 voted against management (54.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 7 Feb 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.