Home / Companies / RingCentral, Inc. / 31 Dec 2025
RingCentral, Inc.: meeting of 31 Dec 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
447 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RingCentral, Inc. meeting of 31 Dec 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 65.8% of reported votes for; 104 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,741 vote records from 144 filers. 10 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
673 vote records from 445 filers. 316 of the 414 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 31 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
291 vote records from 144 filers. 0 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold | Against | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| MFS | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Virtus | No report | Against * | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the RingCentral, Inc. meeting?
447 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 31 Dec 2025. On say-on-pay, 316 of 414 voted against management (76.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RingCentral, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for RingCentral, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RingCentral, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 31 Dec 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.