Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Royal Gold, Inc. / 21 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026829 filers reporting

Royal Gold, Inc.: meeting of 21 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

829 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Royal Gold, Inc. meeting of 21 May 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 86.7% of reported votes for; 56 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,057 vote records from 225 filers. 14 of the 225 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

82.2% for5.8% against12.0% other6.2% against management225 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,260 vote records from 823 filers. 32 of the 791 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 32 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.7% for3.8% against4.5% other4.0% against management823 filers97.5% for2.5% against0.1% other2.5% against management88,750,660 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

525 vote records from 224 filers. 1 of the 224 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.6% for0.0% against0.4% other0.4% against management224 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management38,708,422 reported shares
4

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,058 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *ForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEISplit or no voteForFor
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *ForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsSplit or no voteForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XSplit or no voteForFor
MFSForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
VanEckSplit or no voteForFor
Neuberger BermanForForFor
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Royal Gold, Inc. meeting?

829 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 32 of 791 voted against management (4.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Royal Gold, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Royal Gold, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Royal Gold, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.