Home / Companies / Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. / 26 Jun 2025
Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc.: meeting of 26 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. meeting of 26 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 82.9% of reported votes for; 41 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
819 vote records from 44 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
59 vote records from 40 filers. 1 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
8 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Amend Articles to Withdraw from Nuclear Power Generation
63 vote records from 44 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Amend Articles to Ban Purchase of Party Tickets of Political Parties, Political Organizations and...
48 vote records from 34 filers. 1 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES (A)
48 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES (B)
48 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
45 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. meeting?
44 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 26 Jun 2025. 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 26 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.