Vote Scores

Home / Companies / SpartanNash Company / 9 Sep 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026360 filers reporting

SpartanNash Company: meeting of 9 Sep 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

360 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SpartanNash Company meeting of 9 Sep 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

535 vote records from 346 filers. 49 of the 326 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 20 filers reported this item without a management mark.

79.8% for14.2% against6.1% other15.0% against management346 filers85.1% for14.9% against14.9% against management33,495,799 reported shares
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale

15 vote records from 13 filers. 1 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

84.6% for7.7% against7.7% other8.3% against management13 filers89.0% for1.0% against10.0% other1.1% against management247,373 reported shares
3

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

222 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.0% for0.0% against1.0% other0.0% against management105 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.0% against management15,087,361 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

269 vote records from 120 filers. 7 of the 119 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

93.3% for5.8% against0.8% other5.9% against management120 filers96.4% for3.4% against0.2% other3.4% against management16,404,060 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other0.0% against management22,986 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Say-on-pay2. Merger pay
VanguardForNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForNo report
FidelityForNo report
DimensionalForNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo report
American CenturyAgainst *No report
Franklin TempletonForNo report
InvescoForNo report
EquitableForNo report
Charles SchwabForNo report
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *No report
ProShares and ProFundsForNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo report
J.P. MorganNo reportFor
Goldman SachsForNo report
WisdomTreeAgainst *No report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo report
Jackson National fundsAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *No report
SEIForNo report
T. Rowe PriceForNo report
ThriventForNo report
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaAgainst *No report
First TrustForNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo report
NationwideForNo report
Victory CapitalForNo report
Brighthouse FundsForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForNo report
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo report
BNY MellonAgainst *No report
PrincipalForNo report
Pacific Life fundsAgainst *No report
Global XForNo report
Federated HermesForNo report
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *No report
DWSForNo report
PIMCOForNo report
MassMutualForNo report
Harbor FundsForNo report
Neuberger BermanForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo report
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the SpartanNash Company meeting?

360 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Sep 2025. On say-on-pay, 49 of 326 voted against management (15.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SpartanNash Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for SpartanNash Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SpartanNash Company with a meeting date within three days of 9 Sep 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.