Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Summit Midstream Corporation / 8 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202581 filers reporting

Summit Midstream Corporation: meeting of 8 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

81 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Summit Midstream Corporation meeting of 8 May 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 96.6% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

89 vote records from 25 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

88.0% for0.0% against12.0% other0.0% against management25 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

97 vote records from 78 filers. 12 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

78.2% for15.4% against6.4% other16.4% against management78 filers50.6% for47.9% against1.5% other49.3% against management4,078,498 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

34 vote records from 25 filers. 4 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

84.0% for16.0% against16.7% against management25 filers95.8% for4.2% against4.2% against management2,090,211 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesNo reportForNo report
FidelityForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
InvescoForAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportForNo report
Goldman SachsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForNo report
Victory CapitalForForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
Global XForAgainst *For
VirtusForForFor
VanEckForAgainst *For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Summit Midstream Corporation meeting?

81 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 12 of 73 voted against management (16.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Summit Midstream Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Summit Midstream Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Summit Midstream Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.