Home / Companies / TeraWulf Inc. / 9 Jun 2026
TeraWulf Inc.: meeting of 9 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
508 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the TeraWulf Inc. meeting of 9 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 90.1% of reported votes for; 54 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,458 vote records from 152 filers. 1 of the 147 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
696 vote records from 505 filers. 314 of the 472 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
274 vote records from 151 filers. 1 of the 146 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against * | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | No report | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| Allspring | No report | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | Against * | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the TeraWulf Inc. meeting?
508 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 314 of 472 voted against management (66.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by TeraWulf Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for TeraWulf Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing TeraWulf Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 9 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.