Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Shyft Group, Inc. / 17 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025233 filers reporting

The Shyft Group, Inc.: meeting of 17 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

233 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Shyft Group, Inc. meeting of 17 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

334 vote records from 230 filers. 51 of the 220 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

73.5% for20.9% against5.7% other23.2% against management230 filers91.2% for8.6% against0.2% other8.8% against management27,547,114 reported shares
2

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

153 vote records from 83 filers. 0 of the 79 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.2% for0.0% against4.8% other0.0% against management83 filers99.7% for0.0% against0.3% other0.3% against management9,083,410 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
3

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

192 vote records from 96 filers. 9 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.5% for8.3% against5.2% other9.8% against management96 filers76.5% for23.2% against0.3% other23.5% against management10,012,544 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Say-on-pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalAgainst *
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyAgainst *
Franklin TempletonFor
InvescoFor
EquitableFor
Charles SchwabFor
Nuveen and TIAAFor
ProShares and ProFundsFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertFor
J.P. MorganFor
Goldman SachsFor
WisdomTreeFor
PGIM and PrudentialFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
SEIAgainst *
T. Rowe PriceFor
Lincoln FinancialFor
VoyaAgainst *
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *
NationwideFor
Victory CapitalFor
Brighthouse FundsFor
Guggenheim and RydexFor
Columbia ThreadneedleFor
BNY MellonFor
PrincipalFor
Pacific Life fundsFor
Global XAgainst *
Federated HermesAgainst *
AllianceBernsteinFor
DWSFor
MassMutualFor
Harbor FundsFor
Neuberger BermanAgainst *
BairdFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Shyft Group, Inc. meeting?

233 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 51 of 220 voted against management (23.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Shyft Group, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Shyft Group, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Shyft Group, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.