Home / Companies / TransDigm Group Incorporated / 7 Mar 2024
TransDigm Group Incorporated: meeting of 7 Mar 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
967 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the TransDigm Group Incorporated meeting of 7 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 89.5% of reported votes for; 125 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
7,008 vote records from 312 filers. 9 of the 310 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,480 vote records from 951 filers. 550 of the 930 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
702 vote records from 308 filers. 6 of the 306 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For |
| American Century | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Split or no vote * | Split or no vote |
| MFS | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | Against * |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Against * | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the TransDigm Group Incorporated meeting?
967 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 550 of 930 voted against management (59.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by TransDigm Group Incorporated on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for TransDigm Group Incorporated
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing TransDigm Group Incorporated with a meeting date within three days of 7 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.