Home / Companies / Under Armour, Inc. / 3 Sep 2025
Under Armour, Inc.: meeting of 3 Sep 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
478 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Under Armour, Inc. meeting of 3 Sep 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 75.9% of reported votes for; 84 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,795 vote records from 109 filers. 8 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
711 vote records from 477 filers. 104 of the 450 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
254 vote records from 109 filers. 3 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
To vote on a stockholder proposal
254 vote records from 108 filers. 23 of the 107 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Under Armour, Inc. meeting?
478 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Sep 2025. On say-on-pay, 104 of 450 voted against management (23.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Under Armour, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Under Armour, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Under Armour, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 3 Sep 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.