Home / Companies / Verra Mobility Corporation / 21 May 2024
Verra Mobility Corporation: meeting of 21 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
429 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Verra Mobility Corporation meeting of 21 May 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 68.3% of reported votes for; 113 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
671 vote records from 168 filers. 1 of the 167 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
740 vote records from 422 filers. 35 of the 414 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
337 vote records from 167 filers. 1 of the 166 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Split or no vote | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For |
| DWS | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | Split or no vote | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Verra Mobility Corporation meeting?
429 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 35 of 414 voted against management (8.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Verra Mobility Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Verra Mobility Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Verra Mobility Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.