Home / Companies / Victoria's Secret & Co. / 11 Jun 2026
Victoria's Secret & Co.: meeting of 11 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
536 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Victoria's Secret & Co. meeting of 11 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
18 nominees; 81.0% of reported votes for; 52 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,322 vote records from 164 filers. 5 of the 161 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
9 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
378 vote records from 23 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,371 vote records from 533 filers. 17 of the 499 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 34 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
625 vote records from 163 filers. 2 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Split or no vote | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | No report | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For |
| SEI | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | For | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | For |
| Global X | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Federated Hermes | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| DWS | For | No report | For | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | For |
| Allspring | No report | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | No report | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | For | No report | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Victoria's Secret & Co. meeting?
536 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 17 of 499 voted against management (3.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Victoria's Secret & Co. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Victoria's Secret & Co.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Victoria's Secret & Co. with a meeting date within three days of 11 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.