Home / Companies / Watsco, Inc. / 3 Jun 2024
Watsco, Inc.: meeting of 3 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
863 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Watsco, Inc. meeting of 3 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 56.4% of reported votes for; 106 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
579 vote records from 241 filers. 99 of the 238 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,311 vote records from 847 filers. 490 of the 823 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
569 vote records from 239 filers. 2 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | For | For |
| American Century | Against * | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | Against * | For |
| Invesco | Against * | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Against * | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | For | For |
| Thrivent | Against * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | For | For |
| Voya | Against * | Against * | For |
| First Trust | Against * | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | Against * | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Against * | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | Against * | For |
| Principal | Against * | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| MFS | Against * | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | Against * | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For |
| DWS | No report | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Against * | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Virtus | For | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Against * | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | For |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | Against * | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Watsco, Inc. meeting?
863 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 490 of 823 voted against management (59.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Watsco, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Watsco, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Watsco, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 3 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.